Projektor formater 4/3 og 16/9

den vil stadig fylde læredet, men du vil få sorte kanter, den eneste type projektor ksom kan vise både 4/3 1.85/1 2 2.35/1 er en CRT projektor.

Hmmm...det lyder som om 4/3 projektoren ikke har problemer med materiale i andre formater:

When you have a 4:3 projector, you will want to set it up so that it displays a full 4:3 image on a matching 4:3 format screen. Meanwhile, when you feed the projector a 16:9 signal, it will be displayed using 75% of the native 4:3 frame, with black bars at the top and bottom. Those bars will each be 12.5% of the total picture height. However, when you play movies that are wider than 16:9, like Gladiator, Seabiscuit, and Lord of the Rings (all of which are 2.35:1 format), the size of the black bars increases so that the correct cinematic aspect ratio of these films is maintained

Many folks object to 4:3 format set-ups because they feel the black bars on 2.35:1 films are simply too large relative to the image. One can understand this objection, particularly when you see it on your television in letterbox mode. A 2.35:1 film will be shown with top/bottom black bars that are each about 22% of the picture height. That means 44% of the screen is black. You will recall that such a presentation looks terrible on a television since the image is just way too small compared to what you are used to seeing on that screen. However, on a very large 4:3 screen it doesn't look as bad because the image is still quite large and easy to see.

yeah, det tænkte jeg nok, scream. Men det gør mindre at billedet bliver mindre i højden, når bare bredden bevares. Læg et svar.

It all depends on what you like to watch, and how you like to watch it. The central issue really has to do with your own personal sense of aesthetics—do you believe that "4:3 should be smaller than 16:9?" Do you like the feeling of watching 4:3 television at a certain size, then having the image open up wider to view a widescreen movie? A lot of people would quite understandably say "Yes, of course, isn't that what home theater is all about?"

Ang. den sidste del af ovenstående er jeg af den stik modsatte mening: et 4/3 er altid størst og 16/9 skal bevare bredden (og derfor også shrinke i højde), når bare forholdet mellem højde og bredde bevares, så f.eks. personer ikke bliver ekstremt tykke/tynde at se på (som det er på mit Samsung 16/9 tv: IT SUCKS!)

det kommer her ;) (lidt kan jeg da huske som gammel monitor og projekor tekniker *GG*)

:)
Tak for hjælpen, and off to Netto I am. :)