forskning indenfor CPU rammer en mur

Prøv her: www.tomsharware.com

tomshardware skulle det være

Det du hentyder til, er vel at efterhånden som bredden på de interne forbindelser og elementer nærmer sig molekyle-/atomstørrelse, kan man ikke reducere mere ?-)

-- tag det med i dine søgninger !-)

Yes, roenving - Det. :)

Kigger lige på tomshardware

Kan dælme ikke finde det :(

http://www.tomshardware.com/index.html

Ja, har kigget derinde, men jeg synes det er svært at lave en præcis søgning

Der vil altid være mure, og de vil altid blive brudt før eller senere.

Interview med Intel's CEO:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/09/26/BUGV88SI8T1.DTL

Q: How big is your investment in nanotechnology?

A: Nanotechnology is a buzzword that you in the press have popularized, and the government popularizes it. The formal definition of nanotechnology is anything below 100 nanometers. Every transistor that we make is below 100 nanometers.

So, if you want to know the investment that we're making in nanotechnology, it's the total investment that Intel is making. ... We don't happen to be the nanotechnology that you popularize with carbon nano-tubes and quantum dots and organic molecules that are going to replace CMOS transistors. Most of that is an esoteric and populist impression of what nanotechnology is. The bulk of nanotechnology is what companies like Intel and Texas Instruments and others do today.

Q: Is the process of miniaturization a difference of degree? Or is there at some point where you ... jump off the cliff?

A: We don't refer to it as jumping off the cliff. We refer to it as running into a brick wall. (Laughter). Our strategy is we just motor along at 200 mph, and when we hit the brick wall, we'll hit it at full speed.

We're not slowing down in advance of the brick wall. The brick wall is typically looked at as the smallest dimension that you can use to have a functioning transistor, and we kind of operate in the 90 nanometer range today.

Most theoretical guesstimates are that when you get down to the 5 nanometer range, these things physically don't work anymore, because you've run out of atoms.

You can't split an atom in half or you can't split a molecule in half. But to get to 5 nanometers, you go from 90 to 65 to 45 to 30 to 20 to 12 to 5. So, there's six or so generations between now and then. The next six generations, we'll run 200 miles an hour, full speed ahead.

It's an integral part of following Moore's Law. (Intel co-founder Gordon Moore noted three decades ago that the number of transistors on a chip doubles about every 18 months.) It's an integral part of our whole business strategy, get more functionality per unit area. That's what the integrated circuit is all about. Our intent is to continue to push that as hard as we can.

Ahhh klasse. Det er fint strych9. Læg et svar :)

Nu ved jeg ikke hvor højt niveau du skriver opgave på.
Det er vel værd at lave noget research på de prototyper IBM har præsenteret i de seneste par år. Jeg husker ikke de nærmere omstændigheder eller hvad opfindelsen hed, men det var noget med en atomar computer som kunne lave ting som brute forcing hurtigere fordi den basalt set fungerede helt anderledes.. dunno, søg lidt på ibm

Hvad Intel's CEO siger her gælder CPU arkitektur baseret på transistorer, og han forudser 6 generationer hvilket vil sige 6 x 18 måneder efter at interviewet blev lavet i 2004. Det vil sige han forudser muren er nået i 2013 hvis moores law holder.

Til den tid skal CPU'er så omdesignes drastisk hvis de skal være hurtigere.

Yes, tak... Det kan godt være, det er relevant at skrive lidt om prototyperne. Dog er niveauet relativt lavt, men du skal have tak for hjælpen. Det hjalp. :)

Takker.

Det må være det her jeg husker:
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question475.htm

En kvantecomputer.