1066 MHz eller 800 MHz RAM

Jeg ved ikke om det gør nogen forskel, men hukommelsen er tænkt bruget i dette bundkort: http://www.getmore.dk/templates/imw-product.asp?ProductGuid=GA%2DMA78GM%2DS2H&Test=

(Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H)

800 MHz Coshair 5-5-5-18 RAM koster 558+ for 4 GB (http://edbpriser.dk/Products/Listprices.asp?ID=393166&searchArea=&Soegeord=)

1066 MHz Coshair 5-5-5-12-2T RAM koster 868+ for 4 GB, - men så skal der pludseligt også køler på etc. Jeg vil gerne have en maskine der ikke bruger for meget strøm og ikke larmer for meget (en af grundene til at vælge det board).
(http://edbpriser.dk/Products/Listprices.asp?ID=433129&searchArea=&Soegeord=)

I øvrigt regner jeg med at købe en 45W AMD 2400BE processor.

Det var ikke meget respons.

Jeg har selv fundet noget på Toms Hardware, - tror det er svar nok for mig.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ram-speed-tests,1807-15.html (Direkte til konklussionen)

Citat:
The results must look disappointing for the memory vendors, as the largest performance differences we found amount to 7-8% with DivX and WinRAR, while almost all other benchmarks and applications perform alike: a 1-3% performance delta cannot be noticed at all. Some games showed several per cent performance difference between low-latency high-speed memory and conventional high-latency average speed DIMMs. The synthetic benchmarks on the memory revealed even more differences, but these clearly aren’t very relevant in everyday life.

Our conclusion is very simple: you get the best bang for the buck if you stick to the mainstream of the memory market, which currently is still DDR2-800 or 1066, preferably at low latencies. DDR3-1066 and -1333 memory do not yet result in better performance, and so should only be considered by hardcore enthusiasts, who aim for maximum overclocking performance knowing that they will get little benefit for spending a fortune.

Så det bliver næsten helt sikkert 800 MHz udgaven