Historien/forklaringen bag navnet \"cookies\" (http)

Hmm her er lidt ved ikek om du får svar !?
http://www.html.dk/tutorials/asp/lektion13.asp

Nopes :-(

Det var da et interessant spm.

<snip>
1.2 Where did the term cookies come from?

According to an article written by Paul Bonner for Builder.Com on 11/18/1997:

\"Lou Montulli, currently the protocols manager in Netscape\'s client product division, wrote the cookies specification for Navigator 1.0, the first browser to use the technology. Montulli says there\'s nothing particularly amusing about the origin of the name: \'A cookie is a well-known computer science term that is used when describing an opaque piece of data held by an intermediary. The term fits the usage precisely; it\'s just not a well-known term outside of computer science circles.\'\"
</snip>
kilde:http://www.cookiecentral.com/faq/#1.2

Why are they called cookies
There seems to be some confusion about the origin of the name \"cookie\" (could this be related to industry quietly introducing cookies?). The most common explanation is that the name comes from the Unix programming term \"magic cookies\". As something of a cynic, I am more inclined to think that the term was coined as a reminder of someone enticing or bribing you with a cookie\".

Kilde : http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/cfl-cbgf/liaison/1997/97-6/9706-3e.htm

og der er mere
<snip>
The name cookie derives from UNIX objects called magic cookies. These are tokens that are attached to a user or program and change depending on the areas entered by the user or program. Cookies are also sometimes called persistent cookies because they typically stay in the browser for long periods of time.
</snip>

kilde:http://webopedia.internet.com/TERM/c/cookie.html

Vi sætter vores tekster ret ens op hva` ;-)

Der er en kort forklaring her:
http://webopedia.internet.com/TERM/c/cookie.html

Nåh... for sent... :-)

Tak tak :-)

Tak i lige måde,men hvor blev det sidste point af ? 8+8=16

dengalepose.dk:> I har fået 8,50 point hver, men det er kun hele (nedrundet) point der vises.

oki :)

dvs. at du mister 17 men vi får 16 tilsammen, så der et point-læk. Det ender jo med at eksperten løber tør for point :-)

mipe1:> *G* nej, nej .. du har FÅET 8,50 point men visuelt har du kun fået 8.